Monday, December 03, 2012
New brain gene gives us edge over apes, study suggests
Running too far, too fast, and too long speeds progress 'to finish line of life'
[Report] A Large-Scale Model of the Functioning Brain
Authors: Chris Eliasmith, Terrence C. Stewart, Xuan Choo, Trevor Bekolay, Travis DeWolf, Charlie Tang, Daniel Rasmussen
Sunday, November 11, 2012
Cultivator of Brain Parts
Yoshiki Sasai is not just an ordinary tissue engineer who tries to coax stem cells to grow into fully formed bodily structures. It is true that Sasai has made his mark by taking on big projects like using stem cells to whip up a retina, cortical tissue and the cerebellum, involved with balance and movement. But his research has gone deeper by delving into the way stem cells organize themselves into complex structures under the influence of genes and the prenatal environment. Read a profile of Sasai here to accompany “ Grow Your Own Eye ,” Sasai’s own account of growing a retina in the November Scientific American .
[More]
Monday, September 24, 2012
Efficient use of brain space makes the intelligent person
Monday, August 20, 2012
I may have bad memory, but I make good decisions.
This is at once a threat to our existence. Loss of important information acquired in the past might cost us a bad choice. Effectively, we might make uninformed choices.
Here's sprinkling more salt on the wound. Losing information is one thing, but having our tuning for what's good or bad for us messed with, now that's something warranting some learned helplessness. At least if we forget, we can Google it now. But if we can't distinguish what's good or bad for us, even if it's staring us in the face, right under our noses, then Googling the most relevant hits will do us no good, pun intended.
So, how do we keep our senses tuned?
Wednesday, July 04, 2012
Yellowstone 2012: Day 1
Today's thoughts included:
1. Tim Minchin's Storm is something I contend with.
2. Higgs-Boson particle.
3. Dang it Apple! -- you stole my eye-glass computer screen idea, and you'll probably make it work too, I so love/hate you.
4. Pho.
5. Classes to teach.
6. Grants to write.
7. Research projects to do.
8. Lumix GX1 wins.
9. The Snow Leopard has not yet appeared at our door.
10. DK is cool, but he does go on.
11. ...
You can hardly tell that in 4 hours, we're leaving for Yellowstone.
What I need is a butler.
Yay to vacations, yay to getting back to reality.
Monday, June 18, 2012
Selling our Cars
Upheaval
We travel on with our gear, leaving some stuff, bring some stuff.
Yet we are still the same, having been changed.
The light behind grows dim, the light ahead is blinding.
We only see where our feet will tread.
Where are those who accuse you?
I see no one.
Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Embattled 'Faster-than-Light' Neutrino Experiment Leaders Step Down
Thursday, April 19, 2012
Can You Make Yourself Smarter?
Monday, March 12, 2012
Depth and Breadth for an Efficient Brain: No Short Cuts
A recent development in our understanding of neural structure might be mapped onto this set of physical properties. Based on graph theory, we now know that the way in which the human brain is wired resembles a small-world network. That is, neurons are connected to each other in the brain such that there is an optimal balance between short-distance, local, connections with close neighboring neurons, as well as long-distance connections via hub neurons. This balance of having both types of connections results in the most efficient structure with which information can be transmitted from one neuron to another, on average. Too many local connections, and information must shuttle through an adverse number of short-range synapses before reaching a distant neuron, increasing time of transfer. Too many long-distance connections, and also information must ridiculously pass through distant neurons before arriving at the neuron which is just beside. Other properties emerge that also are used to characterize the degree to which a network is a small-world network - level of clustering and randomness of connections. Using such indices, we now know that the evident connectivity of the brain seems to represent a high-level of efficiency with regards to the processing of information pertaining to stimuli, memory, thought, and action. Because of such neural organization, we are able to read or hear, comprehend, remember, reason, and respond, all literally within the blink of an eye.
With this background, we come back to the opening questions. If our brains are generally already efficient, how does this efficiency change with age, and if it goes down (as we are apt to assume), how do we keep it at optimum efficiency for as long as possible apart from the use of chemical and physical interventions? How do we optimize our small-world networks via mental interventions?
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Lifelong brain-stimulating habits linked to lower Alzheimer's protein levels
Rodrigo y Gabriela Return to Mexico City in Triumph
Solar Eruption Triggers Strongest Radiation Storm in 7 Years - Mashable
National Geographic | Solar Eruption Triggers Strongest Radiation Storm in 7 Years Mashable A huge eruption on the Sun has caused the strongest radiation storm since 2005, which is due to hit Earth on Tuesday, Jan 24, possibly causing widespread communications interference. The eruption occurred late on January 22, 2012 sending a burst of ... Huge solar eruption to reach Earth todayTG Daily Largest Solar Radiation Storm in Six Years Headed Toward EarthBusinessWeek Astronauts in Space Safe from Huge Solar Radiation StormSpace.com Fox News -Los Angeles Times -USA TODAY all 690 news articles » |
Thursday, January 19, 2012
Genetic contributions to stability and change in intelligence from childhood to old age
Genetic contributions to stability and change in intelligence from childhood to old age
Nature advance online publication 18 January 2012. doi:10.1038/nature10781
Authors: Ian J. Deary, Jian Yang, Gail Davies, Sarah E. Harris, Albert Tenesa, David Liewald, Michelle Luciano, Lorna M. Lopez, Alan J. Gow, Janie Corley, Paul Redmond, Helen C. Fox, Suzanne J. Rowe, Paul Haggarty, Geraldine McNeill, Michael E. Goddard, David J. Porteous, Lawrence J. Whalley, John M. Starr & Peter M. Visscher
Understanding the determinants of healthy mental ageing is a priority for society today. So far, we know that intelligence differences show high stability from childhood to old age and there are estimates of the genetic contribution to intelligence at different ages. However, attempts to discover whether genetic causes contribute to differences in cognitive ageing have been relatively uninformative. Here we provide an estimate of the genetic and environmental contributions to stability and change in intelligence across most of the human lifetime. We used genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data from 1,940 unrelated individuals whose intelligence was measured in childhood (age 11 years) and again in old age (age 65, 70 or 79 years). We use a statistical method that allows genetic (co)variance to be estimated from SNP data on unrelated individuals. We estimate that causal genetic variants in linkage disequilibrium with common SNPs account for 0.24 of the variation in cognitive ability change from childhood to old age. Using bivariate analysis, we estimate a genetic correlation between intelligence at age 11 years and in old age of 0.62. These estimates, derived from rarely available data on lifetime cognitive measures, warrant the search for genetic causes of cognitive stability and change.
Learning the Exception to the Rule: Model-Based fMRI Reveals Specialized Representations for Surprising Category Members
Category knowledge can be explicit, yet not conform to a perfect rule. For example, a child may acquire the rule "If it has wings, then it is a bird," but then must account for exceptions to this rule, such as bats. The current study explored the neurobiological basis of rule-plus-exception learning by using quantitative predictions from a category learning model, SUSTAIN, to analyze behavioral and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. SUSTAIN predicts that exceptions require formation of specialized representations to distinguish exceptions from rule-following items in memory. By incorporating quantitative trial-by-trial predictions from SUSTAIN directly into fMRI analyses, we observed medial temporal lobe (MTL) activation consistent with 2 predicted psychological processes that enable exception learning: item recognition and error correction. SUSTAIN explains how these processes vary in the MTL across learning trials as category knowledge is acquired. Importantly, MTL engagement during exception learning was not captured by an alternate exemplar-based model of category learning or by standard contrasts comparing exception and rule-following items. The current findings thus provide a well-specified theory for the role of the MTL in category learning, where the MTL plays an important role in forming specialized category representations appropriate for the learning context.